Supporting Introverts on Product Teams

by Kristen DeLap


Extroversion is praised within American (and similar) society. People who speak the most, process thoughts out loud, or are very social often get a lot of attention, and it is typically positive. They often appear more confident or assertive. Extroversion can be a proxy for competency.

But it wasn’t always this way. In Susan Cain’s book “Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can’t Stop Talking,” she traces the history of valuing extroversion to the changing society of the industrial revolution. American values shifted when we moved from distributed agricultural communities and migrated into larger metropolitan areas. As members of small, close-knit communities centered around farming and family, society placed value on inward traits like work ethic, integrity, and kindness. But the new industrial cities created more anonymous environments, and the ability to stand out or have your individual ideas heard became more important. Extroversion was realized as a positive trait. (Susan Cain also has an excellent TED Talk on the power of introversion.)

Introversion and extroversion may be opposites, but most people fall somewhere on the spectrum between them. The exact middle would be defined as an ambivert, a true balance of either end. Introversion or extroversion also may depend on a person’s environment or familiarity with a group.

Regardless, the goal of a product team is to empower all members of the team to actively contribute. We are also always looking for team members bringing a variety opinions and outlooks, and having a diverse team in terms of personalities is beneficial. Having introverts on the team can balance the more outspoken personalities. Introverts can also bring a level of thoughtful deliberation and depth of perspective, where extroverts may be quicker to act.

However, just having diverse personalities on the team is not enough - you must accommodate everyone’s communication styles to encourage their participation. In addition to psychological safety, there are other ways to create a more inclusive experience for all personalities, especially in our meeting-centric business environment. Generally these accommodations lead to more thorough and thoughtful discussions and decision-making.

  • Collaboration Tools - I am a huge proponent of Miro, but any collaborative virtual space can do the trick if it provides real-time commenting in multiple modes. Polling during a meeting can also be helpful here.

  • Collective Brainstorm prior to discussion - Many of my stand-up prompts follow a similar format of asking a question of the team, providing an opportunity to answer individually (usually through stickies on a board) and then coming back together to discuss. Even if all ideas don’t get discussed, they are usually all read, and will be recorded in meeting artifacts.

  • Agendas! - Letting meeting attendees know what topics will be discussed or what decisions will be made provide those people who need a longer deliberation time to do so prior to the meeting starting.

  • Asynchronous “meetings” - Beginning a dedicated discussion thread via Teams or Slack allows team members to answer once they are confident, or to decide on the correct wording before sharing.

  • What else? Brainstorm more accommodations with your team through the stand-up exercise below.

And, perhaps one of the best considerations of all personalities is simply making space for them. Paying attention to the different needs and preferences of everyone - and valuing those individual differences - creates a culture of respect and acceptance within the team. That leads to better team health, and happier team members - regardless of personality.


STAND-UP EXERCISE

Ask your team to take an introversion/extroversion quiz to see where they might fall on the scale. I had my team use this one from TED.

In our stand-up, we discussed results by polling based on the quiz result. Then, they answered the question of their own accord, placing a dot on a spectrum of where they felt they landed between extrovert and introvert both in their professional life and their personal life. Discussing how these roles flipped for folks between the two environments was very interesting.

We ended with a brainstorm and discussion prompted by the question “How can we better accommodate team members along all points on the scale in meetings / ceremonies / work streams?” The goal is to incorporate those ideas into our product team meetings.


Control versus Accomplishment

by Kristen DeLap


Employee burnout continues to be on the rise, with more than 50% of US workers experiencing at least moderate burnout. As a product leader, keeping a pulse check on your team members can help you spot burnout tendencies before they arise.

There are several risk factors to burnout:

  1. Workload - everything you are responsible for, along with the access to the resources and support you need to meet those responsibilities

  2. Control - your ability to direct or change your own work, setting your own goals and boundaries (can you say no to a request)

  3. Reward - are you receiving recognition, opportunities, a sense of accomplishment, or simply positive feedback for your work

  4. Community - a psychologically-safe environment, where you feel supported and connected, unafraid to show up authentically. Additionally, is the community consistent and fair, or reflect your values.

Three symptoms characterize workplace burnout:

  • Exhaustion

  • Cynicism (including distancing yourself from work)

  • Inefficacy (or feelings of incompetence / lack of achievement)

Being transparent with your product team about what contributes to burnout and if your team is feeling any of the symptoms can help identify where changes might need to be made. It is important to note that while personal factors may complicate or compound burnout, it is by definition a workplace phenomenon. It is about the systems, structures, and demands of the workplace, not the individual employees.

There are many ways to pulse check with your team. The below is based on a weekly survey by Boston Consulting Group that they instituted while experimenting with predictable/mandatory time off. Awhile back I wrote about a tool called Care that provides a questionnaire as well as actionable insights. Regardless of how you do it, these discussions with your team should be a regular part of product team health check-ins.


STAND-UP EXERCISE

Using a survey or the matrix below, ask your team a series of questions based on two factors - control and accomplishment. These are two of the major risk factors when it comes to employee burnout. For control, ask how much predictability or stability team members might have regarding their workload and their schedules. For accomplishment, ask how much value they feel they are providing or if they’ve learned something useful lately. Understanding where team members fall on these axes can provide some insight to their potential levels of burnout.

To push the exercise further, ask team members what type of activities or interactions provide them the largest sense of accomplishment. Potentially think about answers on a timescale of daily, weekly (or by sprint), quarterly, etc. Are there ways you can facilitate or cultivate more of those types of activities?